linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/mm: Don't reenter flush_tlb_func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <b13eee98a0e5322fbdc450f234a01006ec374e2c.1498022414.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:22:07 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     x86@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/mm: Don't reenter flush_tlb_func_common()

It was historically possible to have two concurrent TLB flushes
targetting the same CPU: one initiated locally and one initiated
remotely.  This can now cause an OOPS in leave_mm() at
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:47:

        if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.state) == TLBSTATE_OK)
                BUG();

with this call trace:
 flush_tlb_func_local arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:239 [inline]
 flush_tlb_mm_range+0x26d/0x370 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:317

Without reentrancy, this OOPS is impossible: leave_mm() is only
called if we're not in TLBSTATE_OK, but then we're unexpectedly
in TLBSTATE_OK in leave_mm().

This can be caused by flush_tlb_func_remote() happening between
the two checks and calling leave_mm(), resulting in two consecutive
leave_mm() calls on the same CPU with no intervening switch_mm()
calls.

We never saw this OOPS before because the old leave_mm()
implementation didn't put us back in TLBSTATE_OK, so the assertion
didn't fire.

Nadav noticed the reentrancy issue in a different context, but
neither of us realized that it caused a problem yet.

Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Reported-by: "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Fixes: 3d28ebceaffa ("x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm")
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 2a5e851f2035..f06239c6919f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 static void flush_tlb_func_common(const struct flush_tlb_info *f,
 				  bool local, enum tlb_flush_reason reason)
 {
+	/* This code cannot presently handle being reentered. */
+	VM_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
 	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.state) != TLBSTATE_OK) {
 		leave_mm(smp_processor_id());
 		return;
@@ -313,8 +316,12 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
 		info.end = TLB_FLUSH_ALL;
 	}
 
-	if (mm == this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm))
+	if (mm == this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm)) {
+		local_irq_disable();
 		flush_tlb_func_local(&info, TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN);
+		local_irq_enable();
+	}
+
 	if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
 		flush_tlb_others(mm_cpumask(mm), &info);
 	put_cpu();
@@ -370,8 +377,12 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 
 	int cpu = get_cpu();
 
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask))
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
+		local_irq_disable();
 		flush_tlb_func_local(&info, TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN);
+		local_irq_enable();
+	}
+
 	if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
 		flush_tlb_others(&batch->cpumask, &info);
 	cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask);
-- 
2.9.4