linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos/dsi: Remove error handling for bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPecr9RvAKb6EvfZRmf8UPenRLAqF6_B6DzamNEVbmCmpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:35:25 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com>
Cc:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, jy0922.shim@...sung.com,
        Seung Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
        kgene@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com, a.hajda@...sung.com,
        tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos/dsi: Remove error handling for bridge_node
 DT parsing

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com> wrote:
> Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is
> optionally.

"is optional"

>
> For example, In case of Exynos SoC, a bridge device such as mDNIe and
> MIC could be placed between Display Controller and MIPI DSI device but
> the bridge device is optionally.

Ditto.

BR,
Krzysztof