lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:55:26 +0800
From:   zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
To:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <acme@...nel.org>,
        <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: make sure group events are for the same cpu

On 2017/6/20 21:08, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Zhou Chengming<zhouchengming1@...wei.com>  writes:
>
>> The else branch are broken for taskctx:
> This is not a good way to open a commit message.
>
>> two events can on the same taskctx, but on different cpu.
> How?

fd1 = perf_open_event(attr, pid, 0, -1, flags);
fd2 = perf_open_event(attr, pid, 1, fd1, flags);

fd1 will be the leader event,  fd2 will be the sibling event in the group.

And they are for the same task, so they will be put on the same taskctx successfully
if !move_group.

Obviously it's wrong, we can't concurrently schedule them as a group, since they are
on different cpu.

Thanks.

>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
>
> .
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ