| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <45932b46ea84bfbab2120092f23aff2c522a3945.1498034513.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:55:03 +0800
From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
systemd-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 1/5] ACPI: button: Add a workaround to fix an order issue for old userspace
There are platform variations implementing ACPI lid device in different
ways:
1. Some platforms send "open" events to OS and the events arrive before
button driver is resumed;
2. Some platforms send "open" events to OS, but the events arrive after
button driver is resumed, ex., Samsung N210+;
3. Some platforms never send "open" events to OS, but send "open" events to
update the cached _LID return value, and the update events arrive before
button driver is resumed;
4. Some platforms never send "open" events to OS, but send "open" events to
update the cached _LID return value, but the update events arrive after
button driver is resumed, ex., Surface Pro 3;
5. Some platforms never send "open" events, _LID returns value sticks to
"close", ex., Surface Pro 1.
Currently, all cases work find with systemd 233, but only case 1 works fine
with systemd 229.
Case 2,4 can be treated as an order issue:
If the button driver always evaluates _LID after seeing a LID
notification, there shouldn't be such a problem.
Note that this order issue cannot be fixed by sorting OS drivers' resume
code:
1. When acpi.ec_freeze_events=Y, the order depends on whether PNP0C0D(LID)
or PNP0C09(EC) appears first in the namespace (probe order).
2. Even when acpi.ec_freeze_events=N, which forces OS to handle EC events
as early as possible, the order issue can still be reproduced due to
platform delays (reproduce ratio is lower than case 1).
3. Some platform simply has a very big delay for LID open events.
This patch tries to fix this issue for systemd 229 by defer sending initial
lid state 10 seconds later after resume, which ensures EC events can always
arrive before button driver evaluates _LID. It finally only fixes case 2
platforms as fixing case 4 platforms needs additional efforts (see known
issue below).
The users can configure wait timeout via button.lid_notify_timeout.
Known issu:
1. systemd/logind 229 still mis-bahaves with case 3,4 platforms
After seeing a LID "close" event, systemd 229 will wait several seconds
(HoldoffTimeoutSec) before suspending the platform. Thus on case 4
platforms, if users close lid, and re-open it during the
HoldoffTimeoutSec period, there is still no "open" events seen by the
userspace. Thus systemd still considers the last state as "close" and
suspends the platform after the HoldoffTimeoutSec times out.
Cc: <systemd-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/button.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
index e19f530..67a0d78 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/input.h>
+#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <acpi/button.h>
@@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, button_device_ids);
static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device);
static int acpi_button_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event);
+static void acpi_lid_timeout(ulong arg);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int acpi_button_suspend(struct device *dev);
@@ -104,6 +106,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_button_driver = {
struct acpi_button {
unsigned int type;
struct input_dev *input;
+ struct timer_list lid_timer;
char phys[32]; /* for input device */
unsigned long pushed;
int last_state;
@@ -119,6 +122,10 @@ static unsigned long lid_report_interval __read_mostly = 500;
module_param(lid_report_interval, ulong, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(lid_report_interval, "Interval (ms) between lid key events");
+static unsigned long lid_notify_timeout __read_mostly = 10;
+module_param(lid_notify_timeout, ulong, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(lid_notify_timeout, "Timeout (s) before receiving lid notification");
+
/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS Interface (/proc)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
@@ -371,6 +378,15 @@ static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state);
}
+static void acpi_lid_start_timer(struct acpi_device *device,
+ unsigned long msecs)
+{
+ struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
+
+ mod_timer(&button->lid_timer,
+ jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
+}
+
static void acpi_lid_initialize_state(struct acpi_device *device)
{
switch (lid_init_state) {
@@ -386,6 +402,13 @@ static void acpi_lid_initialize_state(struct acpi_device *device)
}
}
+static void acpi_lid_timeout(ulong arg)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *device = (struct acpi_device *)arg;
+
+ acpi_lid_initialize_state(device);
+}
+
static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
{
struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
@@ -432,6 +455,8 @@ static int acpi_button_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct acpi_device *device = to_acpi_device(dev);
struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
+ if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID)
+ del_timer(&button->lid_timer);
button->suspended = true;
return 0;
}
@@ -443,7 +468,8 @@ static int acpi_button_resume(struct device *dev)
button->suspended = false;
if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID)
- acpi_lid_initialize_state(device);
+ acpi_lid_start_timer(device,
+ lid_notify_timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC);
return 0;
}
#endif
@@ -490,6 +516,9 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device)
ACPI_BUTTON_CLASS, ACPI_BUTTON_SUBCLASS_LID);
button->last_state = !!acpi_lid_evaluate_state(device);
button->last_time = ktime_get();
+ init_timer(&button->lid_timer);
+ setup_timer(&button->lid_timer,
+ acpi_lid_timeout, (ulong)device);
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unsupported hid [%s]\n", hid);
error = -ENODEV;
@@ -526,12 +555,13 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device)
if (error)
goto err_remove_fs;
if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID) {
- acpi_lid_initialize_state(device);
/*
* This assumes there's only one lid device, or if there are
* more we only care about the last one...
*/
lid_device = device;
+ acpi_lid_start_timer(device,
+ lid_notify_timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC);
}
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s]\n", name, acpi_device_bid(device));
@@ -551,6 +581,8 @@ static int acpi_button_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
acpi_button_remove_fs(device);
+ if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID)
+ del_timer_sync(&button->lid_timer);
input_unregister_device(button->input);
kfree(button);
return 0;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists