linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] refcount: Create unchecked atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:57:15 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
        David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, arozansk@...hat.com,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation


* Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> Many subsystems will not use refcount_t unless there is a way to build the
> kernel so that there is no regression in speed compared to atomic_t. This
> adds CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL to enable the full refcount_t implementation
> which has the validation but is slightly slower. When not enabled,
> refcount_t uses the basic unchecked atomic_t routines, which results in
> no code changes compared to just using atomic_t directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> This is v2 of this patch, which I've split from the arch-specific
> alternative implementation for x86. Getting this patch in will unblock
> atomic_t -> refcount_t conversion, and the x86 alternative implementation
> can be developed in parallel. Changes from v1: use better atomic ops,
> thanks to Elena and Peter.
> ---
>  arch/Kconfig             |  9 +++++++++
>  include/linux/refcount.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/refcount.c           |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

Looks almost good - sans a few stylistic nits:

> 
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 6c00e5b00f8b..fba3bf186728 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -867,4 +867,13 @@ config STRICT_MODULE_RWX
>  config ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
>  	bool
>  
> +config REFCOUNT_FULL
> +	bool "Perform full reference count validation at the expense of speed"
> +	help
> +	  Enabling this switches the refcounting infrastructure from a fast
> +	  unchecked atomic_t implementation to a fully state checked
> +	  implementation, which can be slower but provides protections
> +	  against various use-after-free conditions that can be used in
> +	  security flaw exploits.
> +
>  source "kernel/gcov/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
> index b34aa649d204..099c32bd07b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/refcount.h
> +++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static inline unsigned int refcount_read(const refcount_t *r)
>  	return atomic_read(&r->refs);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL
>  extern __must_check bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
>  extern void refcount_add(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
>  
> @@ -52,6 +53,49 @@ extern void refcount_sub(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
>  
>  extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r);
>  extern void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r);
> +#else
> +static inline __must_check bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i,
> +						      refcount_t *r)

Please keep it on a single, slighly over-long line instead of the ugly line break 
in the middle of the list of parameters ...

There's other such uglies in the patch as well.

Thanks,

	Ingo