lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc77ve8nU58hTGrENTYYdjY-tcDgkuzJaNRK-3Hk-_WYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:35:10 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] irq: generic-chip: resource management improvements

2017-06-20 16:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2017-06-20 12:41 GMT+02:00 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>:
>> > There was a kbuild report from June 1st with worrying warnings on x86_64
>> > (though I couldn't see how that was related to these patches). What's
>> > the status of that?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> >         M.
>> > --
>> > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
>>
>> Snap, I looked at it, determined that it was just a header included in
>> include/linux/irq.h (unrelated to the patch) and forgot to comment
>> about it.
>>
>> I've never seen this warning on my setup and don't see it now with rc6.
>
> Yep, that's a genuine x86 snafu. No idea how that got attributed to your
> patch.

So are the patches ok and can be merged for 4.13?

Thanks,
Bartosz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ