[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621104016.GB10220@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:40:17 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:53:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > For arm64, I don't see the point of a cmpxchg, so something like below
> > would do (it needs proper testing though):
>
> Right. cmpxchg is required for x86 PAE, as it has sizeof(pmd_t) >
> sizeof(long). We don't have 8-byte xchg() there.
>
> Thanks, for the patch. I assume, I can use your signed-off-by, right?
Yes. And maybe some text (well, I just copied yours):
---------------8<--------------
arm64: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
We need an atomic way to setup pmd page table entry, avoiding races with
CPU setting dirty/accessed bits. This is required to implement
pmdp_invalidate() that doesn't lose these bits.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
---------------8<--------------
> Any chance you could help me with arm too?
I'll have a look.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists