linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 25/36] swiotlb: Add warnings for use of bounce buffers with SME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170621105026.lcbtkklaenyi2wqe@pd.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:50:26 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 25/36] swiotlb: Add warnings for use of bounce buffers
 with SME

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:54:36PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Add warnings to let the user know when bounce buffers are being used for
> DMA when SME is active.  Since the bounce buffers are not in encrypted
> memory, these notifications are to allow the user to determine some
> appropriate action - if necessary.  Actions can range from utilizing an
> IOMMU, replacing the device with another device that can support 64-bit
> DMA, ignoring the message if the device isn't used much, etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
>  include/linux/dma-mapping.h |   11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/mem_encrypt.h |    8 ++++++++
>  lib/swiotlb.c               |    3 +++
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index 4f3eece..ee2307e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>  #include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
>  #include <linux/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>  
>  /**
>   * List of possible attributes associated with a DMA mapping. The semantics
> @@ -577,6 +578,11 @@ static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>  
>  	if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask))
>  		return -EIO;
> +
> +	/* Since mask is unsigned, this can only be true if SME is active */
> +	if (mask < sme_dma_mask())
> +		dev_warn(dev, "SME is active, device will require DMA bounce buffers\n");
> +
>  	*dev->dma_mask = mask;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -596,6 +602,11 @@ static inline int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>  {
>  	if (!dma_supported(dev, mask))
>  		return -EIO;
> +
> +	/* Since mask is unsigned, this can only be true if SME is active */
> +	if (mask < sme_dma_mask())
> +		dev_warn(dev, "SME is active, device will require DMA bounce buffers\n");

Looks to me like those two checks above need to be a:

void sme_check_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
{
        if (!sme_me_mask)
                return;

        /* Since mask is unsigned, this can only be true if SME is active */
        if (mask < (((u64)sme_me_mask << 1) - 1))
                dev_warn(dev, "SME is active, device will require DMA bounce buffers\n");
}

which gets called and sme_dma_mask() is not really needed.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.