linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] Fix read / write data offsets in read / write loops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170621173622.yrwfi3quuq4l27hd@mikesart-cos>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:36:24 -0600
From:   Michael Sartain <mikesart@...tmail.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] Fix read / write data offsets in read / write
 loops

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:29:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:27:59 -0600
> Michael Sartain <mikesart@...tmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The tot variable in __do_write and do_read is incremented with the amount read
> > / written, but subsequent times through the loop the calls continue to use the
> > original data pointer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Sartain <mikesart@...tmail.com>
> > ---
> >  trace-cmd-local.h | 2 +-
> >  trace-input.c     | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/trace-cmd-local.h b/trace-cmd-local.h
> > index 8595a8a..b8ab35b 100644
> > --- a/trace-cmd-local.h
> > +++ b/trace-cmd-local.h
> > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static ssize_t __do_write(int fd, const void *data, size_t size)
> >  	ssize_t w;
> >  
> >  	do {
> > -		w = TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(write(fd, data, size - tot));
> > +		w = TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(write(fd, data + tot, size - tot));
> 
> Good catch. I'm going to modify this to remove the TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()
> though. I'll hopefully get this pushed out later today, and we could
> add the write_intr() and friends later.

I've got a couple other patches ready to submit. I'll wait for your push,
rebase those, and add a TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY -> *_intr() patch with those.

Thanks much Steve.
 -Mike