linux-kernel - Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5949E7C0.3050106@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:28:00 +0800
From:   Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:     virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, david@...hat.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        aarcange@...hat.com, amit.shah@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        liliang.opensource@...il.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CMD_VQ

On 06/21/2017 12:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:41:41PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>> -	if (!virtqueue_indirect_desc_table_add(vq, desc, num)) {
>> +	if (!virtqueue_indirect_desc_table_add(vq, desc, *num)) {
>>   		virtqueue_kick(vq);
>> -		wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>> -		vb->balloon_page_chunk.chunk_num = 0;
>> +		if (busy_wait)
>> +			while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len) &&
>> +			       !virtqueue_is_broken(vq))
>> +				cpu_relax();
>> +		else
>> +			wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>
> This is something I didn't previously notice.
> As you always keep a single buffer in flight, you do not
> really need indirect at all. Just add all descriptors
> in the ring directly, then kick.
>
> E.g.
> 	virtqueue_add_first
> 	virtqueue_add_next
> 	virtqueue_add_last
>
> ?
>
> You also want a flag to avoid allocations but there's no need to do it
> per descriptor, set it on vq.
>

Without using the indirect table, I'm thinking about changing to use
the standard sg (i.e. struct scatterlist), instead of vring_desc, so that
we don't need to modify or add any new functions of virtqueue_add().

In this case, we will kmalloc an array of sgs in probe(), and we can add
the sgs one by one to the vq, which won't trigger the allocation of an
indirect table inside virtqueue_add(), and then kick when all are added.

Best,
Wei