lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <238915be-22f4-4ea3-addf-0e06700f3c1e@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:28:48 +0200
From:   Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To:     Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Can avic_vm_id_bitmap be made smaller? 2 mbytes feels too large

#define AVIC_VM_ID_BITS                        24
#define AVIC_VM_ID_NR                  (1 << AVIC_VM_ID_BITS)
...
static DECLARE_BITMAP(avic_vm_id_bitmap, AVIC_VM_ID_NR);

The above results in a data object which is 2 megabytes large.

avic_vm_init() -> avic_get_next_vm_id() allocates a new vm_id
by looking for a free bit there. That's the whole purpose
for that bitmap existing.

Is there a way to do this less wastefully? Say, such as
iterating over all existing VMs and picking an id which is
not taken.

I imagine VM creation operation is not that frequent, no need
to make new vm_id selection super fast.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ