[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21644.1498070000@famine>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:33:20 -0700
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To: Michael J Dilmore <michael.j.dilmore@...il.com>
cc: vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON in bond_options.c
Michael J Dilmore <michael.j.dilmore@...il.com> wrote:
>The function below contains a BUG_ON where no active slave is detected. The patch
>converts this to a WARN_ON to avoid crashing the kernel.
>
>Signed-off-by: Michael J Dilmore <michael.j.dilmore@...il.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>index 1bcbb89..c4b4791 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static int bond_option_active_slave_set(struct bonding *bond,
> struct slave *old_active = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> struct slave *new_active = bond_slave_get_rtnl(slave_dev);
>
>- BUG_ON(!new_active);
>+ WARN_ON(!new_active);
This is a reasonable idea in principle, but will require
additional changes to prevent dereferencing new_active if it is NULL
(which would happen just below this point in the code).
-J
> if (new_active == old_active) {
> /* do nothing */
>--
>2.7.4
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists