[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170621.175651.854625612625047729.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: michael.j.dilmore@...il.com
Cc: jay.vosburgh@...onical.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON in bond_options.c
From: Michael D <michael.j.dilmore@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:41:07 +0100
> I don't think you can stop it being dereferenced... you just need to
> prevent an attacker from exploiting the null pointer dereference
> vulnerability right? And this is done by returning the function right
> away?
What's all of this about an "attacker"?
If there is a bug, we dererence a NULL pointer, and we should
fix that bug.
The BUG_ON() helps us see where the problem is while at the
same time stopping the kernel before the NULL deref happens.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists