[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170622162011.583d68d0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:20:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees
Hi Nicholas,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:49:52 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It could be this
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git/commit/?h=thin-ar&id=ec2c9c20f0efab37ae31de44fe0617aa61283905
>
> kbuild: handle libs-y archives separately from built-in.o archives
>
> That touches the lib linking code regardless of CONFIG_THIN_ARCHIVE.
> You should be able to revert it by itself (which will break a few
> other archs, so you would also have to revert the default y patch
> for thin archives to repair your tree if this is the cause).
Yeah, reverting that commit fixes the sparc64 build. (i have not done
that in today;s linux-next release, however).
> I'll try to get around to it after I fix up some other arch breakage
> caused by the series :)
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists