linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170622083118.3ngmh27qg4x5kxho@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:31:18 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements


* Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > I've applied the first patch to the scheduler tree yesterday, but the other
> > changes unfortunately conflicted with other pending scheduler work - could
> > you please re-post the other 3 patches on top of tip:sched/core?
> 
> Sure, here they are.

Hm, what tree is this against? First patch won't apply to the latest 
tip:sched/core:

 patching file kernel/sched/core.c
 Hunk #7 succeeded at 5253 (offset -2 lines).
 Hunk #8 FAILED at 5285.
 Hunk #9 succeeded at 5581 (offset 1 line).
 Hunk #10 succeeded at 6485 (offset 1 line).
 1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched/core.c

Thanks,

	Ingo