[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <594B8287.6000706@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:40:39 +0800
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: "virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"cornelia.huck@...ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"aarcange@...hat.com" <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"amit.shah@...hat.com" <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"liliang.opensource@...il.com" <liliang.opensource@...il.com>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"nilal@...hat.com" <nilal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CMD_VQ
On 06/21/2017 08:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:28:00AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>> On 06/21/2017 12:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:41:41PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
>>>> - if (!virtqueue_indirect_desc_table_add(vq, desc, num)) {
>>>> + if (!virtqueue_indirect_desc_table_add(vq, desc, *num)) {
>>>> virtqueue_kick(vq);
>>>> - wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>>>> - vb->balloon_page_chunk.chunk_num = 0;
>>>> + if (busy_wait)
>>>> + while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len) &&
>>>> + !virtqueue_is_broken(vq))
>>>> + cpu_relax();
>>>> + else
>>>> + wait_event(vb->acked, virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len));
>>> This is something I didn't previously notice.
>>> As you always keep a single buffer in flight, you do not
>>> really need indirect at all. Just add all descriptors
>>> in the ring directly, then kick.
>>>
>>> E.g.
>>> virtqueue_add_first
>>> virtqueue_add_next
>>> virtqueue_add_last
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> You also want a flag to avoid allocations but there's no need to do it
>>> per descriptor, set it on vq.
>>>
>> Without using the indirect table, I'm thinking about changing to use
>> the standard sg (i.e. struct scatterlist), instead of vring_desc, so that
>> we don't need to modify or add any new functions of virtqueue_add().
>>
>> In this case, we will kmalloc an array of sgs in probe(), and we can add
>> the sgs one by one to the vq, which won't trigger the allocation of an
>> indirect table inside virtqueue_add(), and then kick when all are added.
>>
>> Best,
>> Wei
> And allocate headers too? This can work. API extensions aren't
> necessarily a bad idea though. The API I suggest above is preferable
> for the simple reason that it can work without INDIRECT flag
> support in hypervisor.
OK, probably we don't need to add a desc to the vq - we can just use
the vq's desc, like this:
int virtqueue_add_first(struct virtqueue *_vq,
uint64_t addr,
uint32_t len,
bool in,
unsigned int *idx) {
...
uint16_t desc_flags = in ? VRING_DESC_F_NEXT | VRING_DESC_F_WRITE :
VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].addr = addr;
vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].len = len;
vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
flags);
/* return to the caller the desc id */
*idx = vq->free_head;
...
}
int virtqueue_add_next(struct virtqueue *_vq,
uint64_t addr,
uint32_t len,
bool in,
bool end,
unsigned int *idx) {
...
vq->vring.desc[*idx].next = vq->free_head;
vq->vring.desc[vq->free_head].addr = addr;
...
if (end)
remove the VRING_DESC_F_NEXT flag
}
What do you think? We can also combine the two functions into one.
Best,
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists