[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170622092454.n4f2uho5lsp6ox4q@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:24:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 13/14] x86: Enable 5-level paging support
* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Most of things are in place and we can enable support of 5-level paging.
>
> The patch makes XEN_PV dependent on !X86_5LEVEL. XEN_PV is not ready to
> work with 5-level paging.
Please make a short comment about that in the Kconfig code as well, instead of a
silent, undocumented 'depends' clause.
> config PGTABLE_LEVELS
> int
> + default 5 if X86_5LEVEL
> default 4 if X86_64
> default 3 if X86_PAE
> default 2
> @@ -1390,6 +1391,10 @@ config X86_PAE
> has the cost of more pagetable lookup overhead, and also
> consumes more pagetable space per process.
>
> +config X86_5LEVEL
> + bool "Enable 5-level page tables support"
> + depends on X86_64
So since users will be enabling it, this needs a proper help text that explains
what hardware supports it ("future Intel CPUs" will do if models are not public
yet), a short blurb about what it's good for - and a link to the Documentation/
file explaining it all.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists