linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] arch_topology: Get rid of "cap_parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170622094408.puyfkjglvqtlkq3f@e106622-lin>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:44:08 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux@....linux.org.uk, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        arnd.bergmann@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] arch_topology: Get rid of "cap_parsing_done"

Hi,

On 21/06/17 10:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We can reuse "cap_parsing_failed" instead of keeping an additional
> variable here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index d1c33a85059e..8239a6232808 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ int __init topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
>  static cpumask_var_t cpus_to_visit;
> -static bool cap_parsing_done;
>  static void parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
>  static DECLARE_WORK(parsing_done_work, parsing_done_workfn);
>  
> @@ -173,7 +172,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
>  	int cpu;
>  
> -	if (cap_parsing_failed || cap_parsing_done)
> +	if (cap_parsing_failed)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	switch (val) {
> @@ -193,7 +192,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  			topology_normalize_cpu_scale();
>  			kfree(raw_capacity);
>  			pr_debug("cpu_capacity: parsing done\n");
> -			cap_parsing_done = true;
> +			cap_parsing_failed = true;

But we didn't actually failed here, right?

Thanks,

- Juri