lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:38:49 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ACPI / PM: Consolidate device wakeup settings code

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:39:37 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:33:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > -/**
> > - * acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake - Enable or disable device to wake up the system.
> > - * @dev: Device to enable/desible to wake up the system from sleep states.
> > - * @enable: Whether to enable or disable @dev to wake up the system.
> > - */
> > -int acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool enable)
> > +int acpi_pm_device_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool enable)
> 
> Can we call it acpi_pm_device_enable_wakeup() and then provide
> corresponding acpi_pm_device_disable_wakeup()? I find those easier to
> understand than acpi_pm_device_wakeup() that sounds like the device
> should be woken up now.

OK, fair enough.  I'll change it this way.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ