[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170622145516.GZ3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:55:16 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: remove unused variable in boot_cpu_state_init
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:26:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:57:28PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > Without CONFIG_SMP, we get a harmless warning about
> > > an unused variable:
> > >
> > > kernel/cpu.c: In function 'boot_cpu_state_init':
> > > kernel/cpu.c:1778:6: error: unused variable 'cpu' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> > >
> > > This reworks the function to have the declaration inside
> > > of the #ifdef.
> > >
> > > Fixes: faeb334286b7 ("rcu: Migrate callbacks earlier in the CPU-offline timeline")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > I simply added a __maybe_unused in 6441c656acde ("rcu: Migrate callbacks
> > earlier in the CPU-offline timeline") in my -rcu tree. However, your
> > approach does have the advantage of complaining if the code using that
> > variable is removed.
> >
> > So, would you be OK with my folding your approach into my commit with
> > attribution?
>
> Also, note that __maybe_unused can be dangerous: it can hide a build warning where
> there's a _real_ unused variable bug now or due to future changes, causing a real
> runtime bug.
>
> So I think we should consider it a syntactic construct to avoid.
I will review the ones in RCU.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists