linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Support for metadata specific accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170622150848.GA932@destiny>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:08:49 -0400
From:   Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To:     Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, jbacik@...com, jack@...e.cz, jeffm@...e.com,
        chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Support for metadata specific accounting

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:23:20PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> This series is a report of Josef's original posting [1]. I've included 
> fine-grained changelog in each patch with my changes. Basically, I've forward
> ported it to 4.12-rc6 and tried incorporating the feedback which was given to 
> every individual patch (I've included link with that information in each 
> individual patch). 
> 
> The main rationale of pushing this is to enable btrfs' subpage-blocksizes
> patches to eventually be merged.
> 
> This patchset depends on patches (in listed order) which have already
> been submitted [2] [3] [4]. But overall they don't hamper review. 
> 

Hello,

I haven't reposted these patches because they depend on the other work I'm
doing wrt slab shrinking.  We can't do the sub page blocksize stuff until those
patches are in, and then I have to re-evaluate this stuff to make sure it still
makes sense.  Thanks,

Josef