linux-kernel - Re: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:35:13 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Patchwork <patchwork@...uxtv.org>, sakari.ailus@....fi,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        mchehab@...nel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com
Subject: Re: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media]
 Patch notification: 3 patches updated

Em Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:19:03 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> escreveu:

> Hi!
> 
> 
> > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:
> > 
> >  * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times
> >      - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/
> >      - for: Linux Media kernel patches
> >     was: New
> >     now: Accepted  
> 
> Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And
> that would be really nice to fix.)

Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply 
e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot.

> If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well.

> If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that
> someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his
> tree already.

>From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one
that did the change...

However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info
about who changed a status (or even to log it)...

Regards,

Thanks,
Mauro