[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170622163453.iymm3ctqv2a76k6k@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:34:54 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1
On 2017-06-20 09:45:06 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> See ! and ?
See see.
What about this:
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1014,8 +1014,20 @@ struct wake_q_head {
#define WAKE_Q(name) \
struct wake_q_head name = { WAKE_Q_TAIL, &name.first }
-extern void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head,
- struct task_struct *task);
+extern void __wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head,
+ struct task_struct *task, bool sleeper);
+static inline void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head,
+ struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ __wake_q_add(head, task, false);
+}
+
+static inline void wake_q_add_sleeper(struct wake_q_head *head,
+ struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ __wake_q_add(head, task, true);
+}
+
extern void __wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head, bool sleeper);
static inline void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
@@ -1745,6 +1757,7 @@ struct task_struct {
raw_spinlock_t pi_lock;
struct wake_q_node wake_q;
+ struct wake_q_node wake_q_sleeper;
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
/* PI waiters blocked on a rt_mutex held by this task */
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
tsk->splice_pipe = NULL;
tsk->task_frag.page = NULL;
tsk->wake_q.next = NULL;
+ tsk->wake_q_sleeper.next = NULL;
account_kernel_stack(tsk, 1);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
*/
preempt_disable();
if (waiter->savestate)
- wake_q_add(wake_sleeper_q, waiter->task);
+ wake_q_add_sleeper(wake_sleeper_q, waiter->task);
else
wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -430,9 +430,15 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
#endif
#endif
-void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
+void __wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task,
+ bool sleeper)
{
- struct wake_q_node *node = &task->wake_q;
+ struct wake_q_node *node;
+
+ if (sleeper)
+ node = &task->wake_q_sleeper;
+ else
+ node = &task->wake_q;
/*
* Atomically grab the task, if ->wake_q is !nil already it means
@@ -461,11 +467,17 @@ void __wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head, bool sleeper)
while (node != WAKE_Q_TAIL) {
struct task_struct *task;
- task = container_of(node, struct task_struct, wake_q);
+ if (sleeper)
+ task = container_of(node, struct task_struct, wake_q_sleeper);
+ else
+ task = container_of(node, struct task_struct, wake_q);
BUG_ON(!task);
/* task can safely be re-inserted now */
node = node->next;
- task->wake_q.next = NULL;
+ if (sleeper)
+ task->wake_q_sleeper.next = NULL;
+ else
+ task->wake_q.next = NULL;
/*
* wake_up_process() implies a wmb() to pair with the queueing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists