linux-kernel - [tip:irq/core] x86/irq: Cleanup pending irq move in fixup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:50:56 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     marc.zyngier@....com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keith.busch@...el.com, hch@....de,
        hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: [tip:irq/core] x86/irq: Cleanup pending irq move in fixup_irqs()

Commit-ID:  8e7b632237df8b17526411d1d98f838580bb6aa3
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8e7b632237df8b17526411d1d98f838580bb6aa3
Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 01:37:20 +0200
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:21:13 +0200

x86/irq: Cleanup pending irq move in fixup_irqs()

If an CPU goes offline, the interrupts are migrated away, but a eventually
pending interrupt move, which has not yet been made effective is kept
pending even if the outgoing CPU is the sole target of the pending affinity
mask. What's worse is, that the pending affinity mask is discarded even if
it would contain a valid subset of the online CPUs.

Use the newly introduced helper to:

 - Discard a pending move when the outgoing CPU is the only target in the
   pending mask.

 - Use the pending mask instead of the affinity mask to find a valid target
   for the CPU if the pending mask intersects with the online CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170619235444.774068557@linutronix.de

---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index f34fe74..9696007d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -440,9 +440,9 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 	int ret;
 
 	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
+		const struct cpumask *affinity;
 		int break_affinity = 0;
 		int set_affinity = 1;
-		const struct cpumask *affinity;
 
 		if (!desc)
 			continue;
@@ -454,19 +454,36 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 
 		data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
 		affinity = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(data);
+
 		if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data) ||
 		    cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
+			irq_fixup_move_pending(desc, false);
 			raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
 			continue;
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * Complete the irq move. This cpu is going down and for
-		 * non intr-remapping case, we can't wait till this interrupt
-		 * arrives at this cpu before completing the irq move.
+		 * Complete an eventually pending irq move cleanup. If this
+		 * interrupt was moved in hard irq context, then the
+		 * vectors need to be cleaned up. It can't wait until this
+		 * interrupt actually happens and this CPU was involved.
 		 */
 		irq_force_complete_move(desc);
 
+		/*
+		 * If there is a setaffinity pending, then try to reuse the
+		 * pending mask, so the last change of the affinity does
+		 * not get lost. If there is no move pending or the pending
+		 * mask does not contain any online CPU, use the current
+		 * affinity mask.
+		 */
+		if (irq_fixup_move_pending(desc, true))
+			affinity = desc->pending_mask;
+
+		/*
+		 * If the mask does not contain an offline CPU, break
+		 * affinity and use cpu_online_mask as fall back.
+		 */
 		if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
 			break_affinity = 1;
 			affinity = cpu_online_mask;