linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > That's against my copy of tip/sched/core as of yesterday:
> > 
> > commit f11cc0760b8397e0d230122606421b6a96e9f869
> > Author:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
> > AuthorDate: Wed Jun 14 19:37:30 2017 -0700
> > Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue Jun 20 12:48:37 2017 +0200
> > 
> >     sched/core: Drop the unused try_get_task_struct() helper function
> > 
> > on which I pre-applied my previous patch #1/4 ("cpuset/sched: cpuset 
> > makes sense for SMP only") you said having already applied on your side 
> > but that didn't show up in the publicly visible sched/core yet.
> 
> I see where the mismatch comes from - I applied this one from your earlier 
> patches:
> 
>   f5832c1998af: sched/core: Omit building stop_sched_class when !SMP
> 
> ... thus #1/4 was missing from my stack of patches. I'll apply that too and 
> re-try, no need to resend.

OK. Let me know if you still have difficulties.


Nicolas