linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] stmmac: pci: Refactor DMI probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:53:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Cc:     peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] stmmac: pci: Refactor DMI probing

From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:43:51 +0200

> On 2017-06-22 19:40, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:17:56 +0200
>> 
>>> Some cleanups of the way we probe DMI platforms in the driver. Reduces
>>> a bit of open-coding and makes the logic easier reusable for any
>>> potential DMI platform != Quark.
>>>
>>> Tested on IOT2000 and Galileo Gen2.
>>>
>>> Changes in v5:
>>>  - fixed a remaining issue in patch 5
>>>  - dropped patch 6 for now
>> 
>> Series applied to net-next.
>> 
>> Any chance the DMI table can be marked const as well?
>> 
> 
> Hmm, they are all const - or which one do you mean?

Indeed, they are, I misread the patches.

Nothing to see here, move along :)