[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70a09f1b-e82c-a25c-9325-d5d757b1b695@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:59:14 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: lkp@...org, xiaolong.ye@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, serge@...lyn.com, tycho@...ker.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
christian.brauner@...lbox.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
amir73il@...il.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Enable namespaced file capabilities
On 6/22/2017 11:59 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
> in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
> effective on the host. This is to prevent that any unprivileged user
> on the host maps his own uid to root in a private namespace, writes
> the xattr, and executes the file with privilege on the host.
>
> We achieve this goal by writing extended attributes with a different
> name when a user namespace is used. If for example the root user
> in a user namespace writes the security.capability xattr, the name
> of the xattr that is actually written is encoded as
> security.capability@...=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host.
You need to identify the instance of the user namespace for
this to work right on a system with multiple user namespaces.
If I have a shared filesystem mounted in two different user
namespaces a change by one will affect the other.
... unless I'm missing something obvious about namespace behavior.
> When listing the xattrs on the host, the existing security.capability
> as well as the security.capability@...=1000 will be shown. Inside the
> namespace only 'security.capability', with the value of
> security.capability@...=1000, is visible.
>
> To maintain compatibility with existing behavior, the value of
> security.capability of the host is shown inside the user namespace
> once the security.capability of the user namespace has been removed
> (which really removes security.capability@...=1000). Writing to
> an extended attribute inside a user namespace effectively hides the
> extended attribute of the host.
>
> The general framework that is established with these patches can
> be applied to other extended attributes as well, such as security.ima
> or the 'trusted.' prefix . Another extended attribute that needed to
> be enabled here is 'security.selinux,' since otherwise this extended
> attribute would not be shown anymore inside a user namespace.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan & Serge
>
>
> Stefan Berger (3):
> xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces
> Enable capabilities of files from shared filesystem
> Enable security.selinux in user namespaces
>
> fs/xattr.c | 472 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> security/commoncap.c | 36 +++-
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 9 +-
> 3 files changed, 501 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists