lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <401cdb64-6fdb-be30-b8bc-bf51c1a35074@deltatee.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:09:55 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] alpha: provide ioread64 and iowrite64 implementations

On 6/22/2017 2:08 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> But this does not do the same thing as an ioread64 with regards to
> atomicity or side effects on the device. The same is true of the other
> hacks. You either have a real 64bit single read/write from MMIO space or
> you don't. You can't fake it.

Yes, I know. But is it not better than having every driver that wants to 
use these functions fake it themselves?

Logan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ