[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170622213655.07dffac2@alans-desktop>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:36:55 +0100
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] asm-generic/io.h: make ioread64 and iowrite64
universally available
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:24:58 -0600
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 2:14 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > If a platform doesn't support 64bit I/O operations from the CPU then you
> > either need to use some kind of platform/architecture specific interface
> > if present or accept you don't have one.
>
> Yes, I understand that.
>
> The thing is that every user that's currently using it right now is
> patching in their own version that splits it on non-64bit systems.
>
> > It's not safe to split it. Possibly for some use cases you could add an
> > ioread64_maysplit()
>
> I'm open to doing something like that.
I think that makes sense for the platforms with that problem. I'm not
sure there are many that can't do it for mmio at least. 486SX can't do it
and I guess some ARM32 but I think almost everyone else can including
most 32bit x86.
What's more of a problem is a lot of platforms can do 64bit MMIO via
ioread/write64 but not 64bit port I/O, and it's not clear how you
represent that via an ioread/write API that abstracts it away.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists