[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170622220121.GB21214@zurbaran.ger.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:01:21 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Geoff Lansberry <geoff@...ee.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: trf7970a: fix check of clock frequencies, use &&
instead of ||
Hi Colin,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The "or" condition (clk_freq != TRF7970A_27MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUENCY) ||
> (clk_freq != TRF7970A_13MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUE) will always be true because
> clk_freq cannot be equal to two different values at the same time. Use
> the && operator instead of || to fix this.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1430468 ("Constant expression result")
>
> Fixes: 837eb4d21ecde7 ("NFC: trf7970a: add device tree option for 27MHz clock")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to nfc-next, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists