[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YQchHWK+8jEo03dK21xM77pn0YePkjUTVny0-Cx8yYeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:23:00 +0200
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:14:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include
>> <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h>. This will allow
>> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops.
>
> This gets a large number of (simple) rejects when applied to
> linux-next. Can you please redo against -next?
This is based on tip/locking tree. Ingo already took a part of these
series. The plan is that he takes the rest, and this applies on
tip/locking without conflicts.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists