lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170623145441.GB9388@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:54:41 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     tip-bot for Michal Hocko <tipbot@...or.com>
Cc:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, jkosina@...e.cz, mhocko@...e.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, davej@...emonkey.org.uk, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mmap, ASLR: Do not treat unlimited-stack tasks
 as legacy mmap

On 06/23, tip-bot for Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> We added a heuristics to treat applications with RLIMIT_STACK configured
> to unlimited as legacy. This means:

To me this also means a minor security problem. The comment above
PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID says "must be cleared upon setuid or setgid exec",
but if you do "ulimit -s unlimited" before suid exec then
ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT set by security checks will be ignored.

> So let's try and remove this assumption - hopefully nothing breaks.

Agreed.

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ