[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1498233988.7952.45.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:06:28 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mario.Limonciello@...l.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
dvhart@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, tom@...shoeco.com,
jerome.debretagne@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
lv.zheng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle
on recent systems
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 15:37 +0000, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
[...]
> >
> > +#define ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_ON 4
> > +#define ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY 5
> > +#define ACPI_LPS0_EXIT 6
> The spec you shared also defines device constraints (function 1). It
> would be very
> useful if these constraints could be parsed and compared against the
> actual power
> states of devices on the system at least for debugging purposes. I'm
> not sure if you
> already had a plan for that in a future series.
>
For debug purpose, I have worked on a patch to dump the constraint
table in debugfs. But in the freeze path whether we meet the
constraints or not will not make any difference, other than for just
debugging.
Thanks,
Srinivas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists