[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170623171830.GV4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:18:30 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com>,
nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Applied "spi: atmel: fix corrupted data issue on SAM9 family
SoCs" to the spi tree
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_SAM_V4_V5
> + /*
> + * Atmel SoCs based on ARM9 (SAM9x) cores should not use spi_map_buf()
> + * since this later function tries to map buffers with dma_map_sg()
> + * even if they have not been allocated inside DMA-safe areas.
> + * On SoCs based on Cortex A5 (SAMA5Dx), it works anyway because for
> + * those ARM cores, the data cache follows the PIPT model.
> + * Also the L2 cache controller of SAMA5D2 uses the PIPT model too.
> + * In case of PIPT caches, there cannot be cache aliases.
> + * However on ARM9 cores, the data cache follows the VIVT model, hence
> + * the cache aliases issue can occur when buffers are allocated from
> + * DMA-unsafe areas, by vmalloc() for instance, where cache coherency is
> + * not taken into account or at least not handled completely (cache
> + * lines of aliases are not invalidated).
There is a solution to this - code (iow, callers of functions that perform
IO) are expected to use flush_kernel_vmap_range() and
invalidate_kernel_vmap_range() as documented in Documentation/cachetlb.txt
to ensure that their "special" views are properly handled.
These are no-ops for PIPT caches, but aliasing caches have to implement
them.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists