linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d52a1a65-842c-9c73-17f7-5574fcefab2a@siemens.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:09:12 +0200
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000

On 2017-06-21 08:29, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-06-20 13:38, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>> On 2017-06-20 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This makes the gpio-exar driver usable, which was prevented by a number
>>>>> of fatal bugs, and adds support for the SIMATIC IOT2040 to the 8250-exar
>>>>> driver and, indirectly, to gpio-exar as well. It's a cross-subsystem
>>>>> series, so I'm also cross-posting to the serial and gpio lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>>
>>>> I merged some of the patches, that applied. Let's see if they survive
>>>> in linux-next, else I guess we need to fix this in the -rcs or for the next
>>>> kernel cycle.
>>>
>>> Weird that things did not apply. I just did a cherry-pick for all those
>>> 10 patches on top of 5c996b7eb52c, and that went smoothly. Please let me
>>> know which baseline is needed, and I will rebase.
>>
>> This was on the "devel" branch of my GPIO tree:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=devel
> 
> Again, all (missing) patches applied absolutely cleanly for me, see
> 
> http://git.kiszka.org/?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/queues/gpio-iot2000

I've rebased over devel and noticed along this that you will have to
include "serial: uapi: Add support for bus termination" from Greg's
tty-next for the last patch to avoid breaking the build. Result pushed to

http://git.kiszka.org/?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/queues/gpio-iot2000

If you want me to resend anything, just let me know. Would be great to
have the remaining pieces lined up in time for the next merge window.

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux