[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706241413060.1941@nanos>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 14:13:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: PM / wakeirq: Convert to SRCU
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > The wakeirq infrastructure uses RCU to protect the list of wakeirqs. That
> > breaks the irq bus locking infrastructure, which allows sleeping functions
> > to be called so interrupt controllers behind slow busses, e.g. i2c, can be
> > handled.
> >
> > The wakeirq functions hold rcu_read_lock and call into irq functions, which
> > in case of interrupts using the irq bus locking will trigger a
> > might_sleep() splat.
> >
> > Convert the wakeirq infrastructure to Sleepable RCU and unbreak it.
> >
> > Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling")
> > Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> OK
>
> I guess it would be good to get this into 4.12?
I think so, but it probably wants some testing and breeding in next.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists