[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170624162522.48931-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:25:21 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid deadlock caused by lock order of page and lock_op
- punch_hole
- fill_zero
- f2fs_lock_op
- get_new_data_page
- lock_page
- f2fs_write_data_pages
- lock_page
- do_write_data_page
- f2fs_lock_op
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 7d3af48d34a9..9141bd19a902 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1404,8 +1404,9 @@ int do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
}
}
- if (fio->need_lock == LOCK_REQ)
- f2fs_lock_op(fio->sbi);
+ /* Deadlock due to between page->lock and f2fs_lock_op */
+ if (fio->need_lock == LOCK_REQ && !f2fs_trylock_op(fio->sbi))
+ return -EAGAIN;
err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, page->index, LOOKUP_NODE);
if (err)
--
2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists