[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e093314-5148-2e14-33a9-e5d67bd2e7cf@lwfinger.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 12:29:23 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Regression in kernel 4.12-rc1 for Powerpc 32 - bisected to commit
3448890c32c3
On 06/23/2017 03:29 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:49:16PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>>> BTW, could you try to check what happens if you kill the
>>> if (__builtin_constant_p(n) && (n <= 8))
>>> bits in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()? The usefulness of those (in __copy_from_user()
>>> originally) had always been dubious and the things are simpler without them.
>>> If _that_ turns out to cure breakage, I would be very surprised, though.
>>>
>> Sorry I was gone so long. Installing jessie on this box resulted in a crash
>> on boot. Lubuntu 14.04 yielded a desktop with a functioning cursor, but
>> nothing else. Finally, Ubuntu 12.04 resulted in a working system. I hate
>> Unity, but I guess I'm stuck for now.
>
> Ho-hum... Jessie is 3.16, so whatever is crashing there, it's something
> different... Ubuntu 12.04 is what, 3.2?
>
>> I know how easy it is to screw up a long bisection by booting the wrong
>> kernel. To help that problem and to work around the yaconf/yboot nonsense on
>> the MAC, my /etc/yaconf has always had generic kernel stanzas with only
>> default, old, and original kernels mentioned. From there I use a local
>> script to finish a kernel installation by moving the default links to the
>> old ones and creating the new default links pointing to the current kernel.
>> With those long-tested scripts, I'm sure that I am booting the one I want.
>>
>> With the new installation, kernel 4.12-rc6 failed, as did 3448890c with the
>> backported 46f401c4 added.
>>
>> Replacing "if (__builtin_constant_p(n) && (n <= 8))" with "if (0)" had no effect.
>
> OK, that simplifies things a bit. Just to make sure we are on the same page:
>
> * f2ed8bebee69 + cherry-pick of 46f401c4 boots (Ubuntu 12.04 userland)
> * 3448890c32c3 + cherry-pick of 46f401c4 fails (Ubuntu 12.04 userland), ditto
> with removal of constant-size bits in raw_copy_..._user(). Failure appears
> to be on udev getting EFAULT on some syscalls.
> * straight Ubuntu 12.04 works
> * jessie crashes on boot.
I made a break through. If I turn off inline copy to/from users for 32-bit ppc
with the following patch, then the system boots:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 5c0d8a8cdae5..1e6a8723f497 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -267,12 +267,7 @@ do {
\
extern unsigned long __copy_tofrom_user(void __user *to,
const void __user *from, unsigned long size);
-#ifndef __powerpc64__
-
-#define INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER
-#define INLINE_COPY_TO_USE
-
-#else /* __powerpc64__ */
+#ifdef __powerpc64__
static inline unsigned long
raw_copy_in_user(void __user *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
It seems whatever problem I am seeing is in the inline version of
_copy_to_user() and _copy_from_user() on the 32-bit ppc. The only other
difference between the two versions is the placement of the __user macro, which
looks to be wrong in the non-inlined version of _copy_to_user() in
lib/usercopy.c, but that is the one that works.
To me, this looks like a compiler error. On the PowerBook, 'gcc --version'
reports "gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3".
I will prepare a proper patch that I will send to you privately. If you agree
with it, it can be send through normal channels in time for the release of 4.12.
Larry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists