linux-kernel - Re: [v3] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:46:38 -0500
From:   Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
To:     Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@...il.com>
Cc:     roy.pledge@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, colin.king@...onical.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [v3] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck
 hacking jiffies.

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 07:45:18AM +0200, Karim Eshapa wrote:
> Use msleep() instead of stucking with
> long delay will be more efficient.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>

(though the subject line should be "soc/qman: ...")

Leo, are you going to send this patch (and other qman patches) via
arm-soc?

-Scott