linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib: vsprintf: add printf format conversion %M for errno strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a12988d-bbcc-54e7-be16-eeeb94f88d57@gr13.net>
Date:   Sun, 25 Jun 2017 21:53:02 +0200
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <enrico.weigelt@...3.net>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: vsprintf: add printf format conversion %M for errno
 strings

On 25.06.2017 19:27, Joe Perches wrote:

> Every use of %M is going to cause gcc when using __printf to emit
> a warning like:
> 
> unknown conversion type character ‘M’ in format [-Wformat=]

Yeah, that's still an open problem. Actually, I still haven't found out,
how it's done w/ all the other kernel-internal conversions. I was under
the impression, there was some magic to tell the compiler which letters
correspond to which types - unfortunately, didn't find anything like
that. Is that really hardcoded in gcc ?

> Beyond that, why is this useful?

Use that instead of %d where errno values are printed/logged.

> There can't possibly be any fast-path use.

I'm using it eg. for driver development - always having to look up the
numbers is quite ugly and time consuming.

> Why not just create a function that does errno/string conversions?

Already was about to do so. Shall I call it strerror() ?

--mtx

--
Enrico, Sohn von Wilfried, a.d.F. Weigelt,
metux IT consulting
+49-151-27565287