lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 25 Jun 2017 14:54:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: sm750fb: avoid conflicting vesafb

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 01:43:34PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:32:57PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > From: Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>
> > 
> > If vesafb is enabled in the config then /dev/fb0 is created by vesa
> > and this sm750 driver gets fb1, fb2. But we need to be fb0 and fb1 to
> > effectively work with xorg.
> > So if it has been alloted fb1, then try to remove the other fb0.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
> > ---
> 
> Hi Greg,
> You applied the second patch but not this one. Did I miss any review
> comments from you about this one?

All of the other complaints about this patch were not sufficient for me
to justify ignoring it?  Why would I not listen to them?

Please fix and resend if you want it applied.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists