lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:29:58 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree with the
 v4l-dvb-fixes tree

Hi Mauro,

Today's linux-next merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree got conflicts in:

  Documentation/media/uapi/dvb/fe-diseqc-send-burst.rst
  Documentation/media/uapi/dvb/fe-set-tone.rst
  Documentation/media/uapi/dvb/fe-set-voltage.rst

between commit:

  affd250dec17 ("[media] dvb uapi docs: enums are passed by value, not reference")

from the v4l-dvb-fixes tree and commit:

  d9c4615854ec ("[media] dvb uapi docs: enums are passed by value, not reference")

from the v4l-dvb-next tree.

I fixed it up (I used the version from the former tree since it was
committed more recently) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now
fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts
should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is
submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with
the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists