linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Suppress IO_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:07:42 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Suppress IO_PAGE_FAULTs in kdump kernel

Hi Baoquan,

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 07:43:10PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Do you think whether it's necessary to continue my kdump fix of amd iommu
> patchset? Seems my last post was in Jan this year. I know you are very
> busy on fixing bugs and reviewing tons of patches. Without your
> guidance and reviewing, I absolutely can't make it. So I would like to
> hear your suggestions and idea.
> 
> I focused on kaslr issues recently, now most of them have been
> fixed. My boss discussed with me about the next plan. If you have other
> plan, I can sync it to our team about the status of upstream.

Sorry for my silence on the patches, I have not yet found the time to
look deeply into them. I am still interested in them, so how about you
do a rebase/repost after the next merge window and then I will take the
time for a more in depth review and discussion?


Thanks,

	Joerg