[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170626101557.GV3730@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 03:15:57 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
John Keeping <john@...anate.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / wakeirq: Convert to SRCU
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [170625 11:29]:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:31:13PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The wakeirq infrastructure uses RCU to protect the list of wakeirqs. That
> > breaks the irq bus locking infrastructure, which is allows sleeping
> > functions to be called so interrupt controllers behind slow busses,
> > e.g. i2c, can be handled.
> >
> > The wakeirq functions hold rcu_read_lock and call into irq functions, which
> > in case of interrupts using the irq bus locking will trigger a
> > might_sleep() splat.
> >
> > Convert the wakeirq infrastructure to Sleepable RCU and unbreak it.
> >
> > Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling")
> > Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Looks good to me!
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
And still works for me!
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists