[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7f9ee0a-706c-04d4-a21f-65bf6c214fde@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:16:10 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luis Claudio R . Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rt: Increase/decrease the nr of migratory tasks when
enabling/disabling migration
On 06/24/2017 08:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> +enum inc_dec_migratory {
>> + DEC_NR_MIGRATORY = -1,
>> + INC_NR_MIGRATORY = 1,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline void
>> +inc_dec_nr_migratory(struct task_struct *p, enum inc_dec_migratory id)
>> +{
>> + if (unlikely((p->sched_class == &rt_sched_class ||
>> + p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class) &&
>> + p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
>> + if (p->sched_class == &rt_sched_class)
>> + task_rq(p)->rt.rt_nr_migratory += id;
>> + else
>> + task_rq(p)->dl.dl_nr_migratory += id;
>> + }
>> +}
> How about just 'long delta', pass in +1 or -1 and do away with the
> inc_dec_migratory complication?
Ack! I am cooking a v2 using a long delta, rather than the
inc_dec_migratory complication (yeah, I exaggerated hehe).
Thanks!
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists