linux-kernel - Re: Applied "spi: Document the STM32 SPI bindings" to the spi tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:22:40 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Applied "spi: Document the STM32 SPI bindings" to the spi tree

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:16:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
> 
>    spi: Document the STM32 SPI bindings
> 
> has been applied to the spi tree at
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 
> From 82a29bf9952acd1be7e76783604686abeb4e5b1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:32:05 +0200

A bit quick on the applying as there are several comments...

Rob