[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170626213735.fp34vx7mvbtopzz6@redbean>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:37:36 +0200
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, martin.wilck@...e.com,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
hare <hare@...e.com>, rwright@....com,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>, David Sterba <DSterba@...e.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, rgoldwyn@...e.com,
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] kmod: help make deterministic
+++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
>On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
>>> just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
>>> try to avoid hammering more than 50 kmod threads as they can fail and it'd
>>> get -ENOMEM.
>>>
>>> We do away with the old heuristics on assuming you could end up with
>>> less than max_threads/2 < 50 threads as Dmitry notes this would mean having
>>> a system with 16 MiB of RAM with modules enabled. It simplifies our patch
>>> "kmod: reduce atomic operations on kmod_concurrent" considerbly.
>>>
>>> Since the sysctl interface is gone, this no longer depends on any
>>> other patches, the series is independent. As usual the series is
>>> available on my linux-next 20170526-kmod-only branch which is based
>>> on next-20170526.
>>>
>>> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux-next.git/log/?h=20170526-kmod-only
>>>
>>> Luis
>>>
>>> Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
>>> module: use list_for_each_entry_rcu() on find_module_all()
>>> kmod: reduce atomic operations on kmod_concurrent and simplify
>>> kmod: add test driver to stress test the module loader
>>> kmod: throttle kmod thread limit
>>
>> About a month now with no further nitpicks. What tree should these changes
>> go through if there are no issues? Andrew's, Jessica's ?
>
>Seems like going through Jessica's would make the most sense?
Would be happy to take patches 01 (which I need to anyway), 02,
possibly 04 if decoupled from the test driver (03). I can't take patch
03 through my tree just yet, as I haven't had time to give it a look
yet :-/
[ Side comment, it seems that kmod.c isn't directly maintained by anyone
right now, perhaps Luis would be interested in picking it up? :-) ]
Thanks,
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists