[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48116220-b89b-7413-ea62-c78dfb0594a2@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:43:58 -0700
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
tixy@...aro.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: memblock limit must be pmd-aligned
On 06/26/2017 10:23 AM, Doug Berger wrote:
> There is a path through the adjust_lowmem_bounds() routine where if all
> memory regions start and end on pmd-aligned addresses the memblock_limit
> will be set to arm_lowmem_limit.
>
> However, since arm_lowmem_limit can be affected by the vmalloc early
> parameter, the value of arm_lowmem_limit may not be pmd-aligned. This
> commit corrects this oversight such that memblock_limit is always rounded
> down to pmd-alignment.
>
> The pmd containing arm_lowmem_limit is cleared by prepare_page_table()
> and without this commit it is possible for early_alloc() to allocate
> unmapped memory in that range when mapping the lowmem.
>
Do you have an example system or configuration where you see this
crash?
Thanks,
Laura
> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 31af3cb59a60..2ae4f9c9d757 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
> if (memblock_limit)
> memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
> if (!memblock_limit)
> - memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> + memblock_limit = round_down(arm_lowmem_limit, PMD_SIZE);
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) {
> if (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > arm_lowmem_limit) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists