[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170627195239.GL18666@tuxbook>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:52:39 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, yi1.li@...ux.intel.com,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, nbroeking@...com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
mfuzzey@...keon.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
jewalt@...innovations.com, rafal@...ecki.pl,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, atull@...nel.org,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>, pmladek@...e.com,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>, luto@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, pjones@...hat.com,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters
On Tue 27 Jun 12:08 PDT 2017, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:59:15AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue 27 Jun 11:03 PDT 2017, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > [..]
> > > Let's consider a crazy case where the uevent gets triggered, and userspace goes
> > > and signals Elon Musk somehow to transmit the needed firmware from Mars through
> > > a serial satellite link to earth, and somehow someday the device is finally
> > > ready to upload firmware from userspace. Once Elon's firmware lands home, we
> > > know all needed firmware has arrived so anything missing we can acknowledge now
> > > as missing, so we upload what we can and kick firmward into final-mode to tell
> > > the kernel we know we're really ready and any pending things will have to be
> > > given up.
> > >
> > > This would prove the custom fallback crap was also never needed.
> > >
> >
> > Are you saying that each kernel driver should be written so that it will
> > either do direct loading or use firmwared?
>
> Hell No! You can fork firmwared or use whatever the hell bin-foo you want.
> Even if its proprietary and glued with evil rainbow unicorns on it. The dual
> mode, best-effort mode and final-mode devices it implemented are key to what
> you want to mimic as an example to achieve the goal in question.
>
I'm sorry but your language is totally inappropriate and the reason why
I tend to stay away from firmware-related discussions.
> Please give that thought / architecture solution a spin and let me know if
> it suffices for your needs.
>
Which solution do you refer to here?
But as I said, in my view, the decision of making the kernel depend on a
user space firmware loading mechanism or direct loading should be that
of the system designer - not the kernel.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists