lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd9cc4ad-0f2c-ecb4-cf9d-010717439c4c@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:16:07 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...com>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO

Hi Bjorn,

>>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> On 06/27/2017 01:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware
>>> running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG.
>>
>> This is not entirely accurate though. RPMSG is the IPC transport on
>> these remoteprocs, you seem to suggest that there are alternatives for
>> these remoteprocs. Without RPMSG, you can boot, but you will not be able
>> to talk to the remoteprocs, so I would call it a functional dependency.
>>
> 
> IMHO this functional dependency is not from the remoteproc driver but
> your system (and firmware) design. It should be possible to write
> firmware that exposes any other type of virtio device.

You may want to add this clarification to your commit description then.

> 
>>> As such RPMSG should be selected by the system integrator and not
>>> automatically by the remoteproc drivers.
>>>
>>> This does solve problems reported with circular Kconfig dependencies for
>>> Davinci and Keystone remoteproc drivers.
>>
>> The Keystone one issue shows up on linux-next (and not on 4.12-rcX) due
>> to the differing options on RESET_CONTROLLER on VIDEO_QCOM_VENUS
>> (through QCOM_SCOM).
> 
> That's probably why I didn't see this when build testing before pushing
> this.
> 
>> This can also be resolved by changing the depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
>> to a select RESET_CONTROLLER or dropping the line.
>>
> 
> Except that this would violate the general rule of "don't use 'select'
> for user-selectable options".

Yeah well, there seems to all sorts of usage w.r.t RESET_CONTROLLER and
VIRTIO. And if the ARCHs enable the ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER, the
RESET_CONTROLLER dependencies are not even needed.

A quick grep on 4.12-rc7 yielded 20 occurrences that uses depends on and
21 for selects RESET_CONTROLLER. Similar numbers on VIRTIO are 9 and 9
(with a split between different VIRTIO drivers even).

> 
>> The davinci one is tricky though, as I did change it from using a select
>> to a depends on dependency, and obviously ppc64_defconfig is something
>> that I would not check.

Posted a cleanup series that removes the VIRTUALIZATION dependency from
REMOTEPROC and RPMSG_VIRTIO options, the latter fixes the
ppc64_defconfig issue with davinci remoteproc.

>>
> 
> While I hate the process of figuring out and enable all the dependencies
> to be able to enable a particular config, this change does reduce the
> risk of running into more of these cyclic dependencies.
> 
>> This patch definitely resolves both issues, but it is not obvious that
>> someone would also have to enable RPMSG_VIRTIO to have these remoteprocs
>> useful when looking at either of the menuconfig help.
>>
> 
> This is a common issue we have with config options and while I hate to
> add another item to the list of things that you can miss in your system
> configuration I would prefer that my Kconfig is maintainable.
> 
> This also means that most remoteproc drivers should "depends on MAILBOX"
> and not select either the framework or the specific drivers.  But let's
> try to ignore that until after the merge window.

Yeah ok, as long as you follow a consistent rule across all
remoteproc/rpmsg drivers, that's fine. In fact, other than RPMSG_VIRTIO,
the two drivers I added for this merge window do use/switches to a
depends on convention.

regards
Suman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ